Talk:Molestia

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 August 2012. The result of the discussion was keep.

Spiders Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spiders, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spiders on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpidersWikipedia:WikiProject SpidersTemplate:WikiProject SpidersSpiders articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Asia: China Low‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	China portal This article is supported by WikiProject China (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

brony schmony

“

'Molestia' is a popular term incorporated into the brony subculture, denoting the pseudonym of Princess Celestia as is written in a popular fan-fiction work named Molestia, in which Celestia reveals a psychotic second personality.

”

First, it's unreferenced. Second, is the fanfic really notable? Third, is there any reason to suppose that the character/pseudonym is named for the spider rather than in a simple sophomoric pun unrelated to spiders? —Tamfang (talk) 01:55, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is a really useful cite for wiping these sections away: WP:POPCULTURE.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 02:54, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]