Talk:Molesey

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Surrey Mid‑importance

	Surrey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

River Thames (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject River Thames, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames articles

West or East Molesey

The name of the article is East Molesey but the article appears to be about Molesey as an whole (including West Molesey), so my question is: why not move the article to Molesey as at the moment it just redirects to here. TheEnlightened 23:38, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I just created an article about Molesey in the German Wikipedia and it was a bit confusing, finding the information here under this name. Molesey should be deleted, then East Molesey moved to Molesey and West Molesey and East Molesey be turned into redirects - that would be the most logical solution for me. --Proofreader 19:30, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

East Molesey and West Molesey are two separate places though they have merged into one. There really should be two separate pages. SuzanneKn 23:07, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Both west and east Molesey should fall under the same article. There is no point in having two articles for effectively what is now the same place. East and west Molesey should redirect to this page and this article should be named Molesey. Oliverwk 10:18, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Name derivation

I wanted to remove the 'citation needed tag' on the name derivation so I have put in a reference from a sensible source but that conflicts with the comment noted below which has a different spelling. I'm not sure what the Book of Molesey is as it is not in the references. Perhaps someone knows more about it than me. The piece I deleted goes:

The Book of Molesey by Rowland Baker dates Molesey to around the year 666 where the area of Mulesei was given to the Benedictine monks of Chertsey.

The Benedictine monks was Chertsey Abbey and 666 is the 7th century but the name spelling is different. SuzanneKn (talk) 21:04, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The source you changed the reference to point to (Molesey Residents' Association) contains reworded extracts from The Book of Molesey. Eorl 18:00, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History

Did nothing at all happen in Molesey between 1200 and 1968? Really? Skinsmoke (talk) 16:59, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Molesey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:31, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Urban District of East and West Molesey

Mentioned in the text - but does not appear on List of urban districts formed in England and Wales 1894–95 or List of urban districts formed in England and Wales 1896–1974. Clarification anyone? Suitable references are [1] and [2]. Jackiespeel (talk) 19:14, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Crime section

The crime section is not very useful because there is no sense of how the crime rates compare to the UK average. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aussiewikilady (talk • contribs) 21:13, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]