Talk:Mohammad Abdul Ghafoor Hazarvi

This article was nominated for deletion on August 15, 2013. The result of the discussion was delete.

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Editors of this (and all Wikipedia articles) should talk note of Wikipedia's policies on maintaining a neutral point of view and verifiability. I have removed text for the article that advanced one point of view over others, including the dispute between Muslims and Hindus over the partition of India, and text that celebrates the subject of the article, instead of reporting objectively on him. Ground Zero | t 12:35, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I have made edits to bring this article in line with the Wikipedia:Manual of Style and WP:REPEATLINK. These edits must not be reverted without discussion. Ground Zero | t 14:10, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

W ref to the notes above by Ground Zero, this article seems to still be full of many problems and issues-basic ones such as v poor and unreliable references and extremely bad writing which is very confusing ; to a definite slanted/biased POV that seems to project the subject in some sort of 'peacock' style language, as some sort of messiah or do-it-all. Which certainly wasnt the case, historically speaking. I would strongly suggest that this article be drastically cut and pruned and revised, and made succinct and clear and neutral. would especially welcome proper reliable references, not self-published sources or sources closely linked to the subject. Thank you Khani100 (talk) 21:16, 26 September 2014 (UTC)Khani100[reply]

Further points to note please -- this article state that the subject Mullah Hazarvi's father was a 'descendant' of the Sufi Maudood Chishti and cites some 'Adams, pp 100-101' as the source of this information; but then there is no detail about this Adams or where he said it or when, or int what context etc? Also, the article informs us in the Infobox that Hazarvi was ethnically a Karlal who are either a Rajput or Saka tribe. If so then how can he be a 'descendant' of Maudood Chishti, who was from the family of Baba Farid the famous Sufi of Pakpattan?-- That family are Farooqi according to historians? There seems to be a basic, factual discrepancy and I am removing the dubiously referenced material forthwith. Thanks Khani100 (talk) 21:28, 26 September 2014 (UTC)Khani100[reply]

Orphaned references in Mohammad Abdul Ghafoor Hazarvi

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Mohammad Abdul Ghafoor Hazarvi's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "auto":

From Mast (Sufism): Haynes, Charles, Meher Baba, the Awakener, Avatar Foundation, Inc., 2nd ed. 1993. p. 45
From All India Sunni Conference: David 1988

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:40, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Mohammad Abdul Ghafoor Hazarvi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]