Talk:Modesta Ávila/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krimuk90 (talk · contribs) 02:36, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ávila is official Spanish spelling but most sources refer to her as Avila. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:10, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In "Prosecution and imprisonment" "..at the newly opened Orange County Superior Court" should be "..at the then newly opened..."

"Her lawyer, George Hayford, himself of dubious standing". The source provided does not mention his name, but says that he was inexperienced and "probably crooked".

Direct quote added.

Are Ricardo Sánchez, Fred Gómez Carrasco, and Alvaro Luna Hernandez notable enough to have their own articles in the future?

Definitely. I had already blue linked a number. I'll try to blue those too. The judge though, nothing on him, will de link.

Is sanjuancapistrano.net" a notable enough source? Can we replace this with a better one?

I believe so, it seems to be reliable source for local stuff.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:21, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One possible problem -- this article seems to confuse the Southern Pacific and Santa Fe Railroads.Cmuncey (talk) 19:27, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail: -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 10:54, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]