Jump to content

Talk:Modern United States commemorative coins

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Circulating Commemerative Coins

[edit]

In my many years of coin collecting, I've noticed that there are two different kind of commemerative coins, circulating, and collector's.

With some exceptions, like the columbian exposition half dollars and the Booker T. Washington/Washington-Carver halves of 1946 and 1952, commems were of low mintange and sold originally in sets.

However, the Bicentennial coinage of 1976 and the Westward Journey nickels and State quarters, are circulating coins, or at least they're supposed to be. So what I did, is I put them on the list as modern commemeratives along with the presidential dollars, which are supposed to circulate.

No commemorative coins as far as I know were intended for circulation. The Columbian halves were sold for a dollar and some of the ones that didn't sell were melted. Some were also held by the banks as collateral for the Expositions unpaid loans, these were then released into circulation when the loans were defaulted. That does not qualify as intended for circulation.
The coins you've added on this page are 100% intended for circulation, therefore not commemoratives. No other coins of the same denominations were minted. The new dollar coins are different, the sackie will still be minted, so they are an addition to circulating coins and in my opinion loosely qualify as a commemorative although it is debatable. Bobby I'm Here, Are You There? 03:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. The Sackies are set-only, and the presidential dollars are going to be minted for circulation, thus they aren't commems. Ericl 22:52, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you go read the act. 1/3 of all circulating dollar coins must be sackies...
(ii) CIRCULATION QUANTITY- Beginning January 1, 2007, and ending upon the termination of the program under paragraph (8), the Secretary annually shall mint and issue such 'Sacagawea-design' $1 coins for circulation in quantities of no less than 1/3 of the total $1 coins minted and issued under this subsection.
Bobby I'm Here, Are You There? 23:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Some of these coins have their own pages in wikipedia. It would be great if we linked to those pages where available. I didn't see an obvious spot in the table for the links. Lorax (talk) 02:12, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have thought the same thing but don't see an obvious solution either. —Diiscool (talk) 13:19, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:1993 James Madison Proof Obv.jpeg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:1993 James Madison Proof Obv.jpeg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:35, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:2000Library of Congress obv.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:2000Library of Congress obv.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:13, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

[edit]

I've redirected the following pages to this one:

---Another Believer (Talk) 05:14, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Modern United States commemorative coins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:57, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2019

[edit]

This article should probably mention that there are two varieties of the Apollo 11 dollar, regular and five-ounce. Also, note that the Mint is starting in 2019 striking commemoratives in .999 silver. Thanks for keeping this article updated.--Wehwalt (talk) 09:23, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated Coins of the United States dollar with the new composition. - ZLEA Talk\Contribs 16:28, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:100th anniversary 2016-W Mercury dime gold.jpg

[edit]

File:100th anniversary 2016-W Mercury dime gold.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

-- Marchjuly (talk) 01:03, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:100th anniversary 2016-W Walking Liberty half dollar gold.jpg

[edit]

File:100th anniversary 2016-W Walking Liberty half dollar gold.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

-- Marchjuly (talk) 01:05, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:100th anniversary 2016-W Standing Liberty quarter gold.jpg

[edit]

File:100th anniversary 2016-W Standing Liberty quarter gold.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

-- Marchjuly (talk) 01:12, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]