Talk:Modern US endurance UAVs

	Aviation portal This redirect is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
	This redirect is supported by the aircraft project.

Robotics Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States Start‑class

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This redirect does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Complete sh*t

this article is a pretty big mess, I don’t even think it’s necessary for it to exist NascarLarry (talk) 03:59, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can agree with that, the article is not needed at all. Also, it looks more like a YouTube video script more than an encyclopedia article. RealNuclearFish (talk) 20:28, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I concur, this article is messy in its entirety. DragonEggLol (talk) 04:38, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]