Talk:Modern Family/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: GRAPPLE X 21:16, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Always meant to try this show out, but the fact that it isn't Married with Children always put me off.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- Prose style seems fine (though I'd replace "mom" with "mother", and there are two DAB links); MOS seems good too.
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Citations seem okay, everything's backed up and sourced; except for one missing citation - can we find a source for this? It doesn't seem vital so I'd say either source it or remove it.
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Scope is fine, not too broad or too narrow.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Article is neutral and unbiased.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- History is uncontroversial and stable.
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Images seem fine. Rationale for fair use and public domain both look sound.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- As it is, I see no reason not to pass this as a Good Article. The only changes needed are very minor, but I'd still like to see it done. Good job.
- Pass or Fail: