Talk:Mobile ticketing
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Untitled
[edit]The mobile ticketing is intended for the any show oriented organizations for e.g.: film theatres, stadiums, concert halls…etc. For instance assume foot ball stadium has installed Mobile ticketing system then its works like this, A user who want to watch foot ball match will buy ticket online, upon receiving payment stadium sends the DATA MATRIX code (data matrix code is like the bar code which is encoded version of the ticket) to his mobile through SMS. Then he will come to stadium and wave his mobile before the cameras, after that the transit will open or stops him depending his DATA MTRIX code. --Kiran cheriyala 20 June 2006
- We also have another way, that is waiting for the solution! --202.78.224.101 23 July 2007
18092018 - Hugo Beunder This part should be deleted: The term can also refer to a method by which law enforcement agencies use in-car computers to create traffic citations in the field, then print a hard copy for the offender. There is no reference at all on the internet of usage of the phrase mobile ticketing for traffic fines. If there will be no reaction I will delete this text. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by HugoBeunder (talk • contribs) 12:42, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- I will delete the part about supposed disadvantages. None of them make sense. e.g. Premium SMS has never been used in the process of mobile ticketing. Tickets were purchased over the internet via a ticketing website from the supplier directly. Forgery is more of a problem with paper tickets, mobile tickets can be encrypted and are virtually 100% save if a sound protection scheme is being implemented. Normally mobile tickets can be re-downloaded so risk of losing is in fact less then with paper tickets. Mobile Ticketing as such does not impede the selling of paper tickets. These arguments were valid in 2003 and more so now in 2018.--HugoBeunder on 20 September 2018
30-9-2018. I deleted the part about REDEMPTION. It did not make any sense. Some remark about off-line validation I will add somewhere in the article as this is important. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HugoBeunder (talk • contribs) 13:54, 30 September 2018 (UTC) I re-wrote large part of the text on mobile tikceting. I added a number of references from trusted sources. Although it still needs improvement, which I will take care of, it is my opnion that the remark about multiple issues can be removed. Anyway, It would be good if someone else who has knowledge in the field is willing attribute. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HugoBeunder (talk • contribs) 23:22, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 January 2019 and 8 March 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lydia0730.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Issues with article
[edit]The article is in an exceptionally poor state. Additionally, the major recent editor, Hugo, talks about working for a company which now appears SIX times in the article. It needs serious re-writing but not by people promoting their own company!!! Rayman60 (talk) 22:12, 14 October 2018 (UTC) Rayman does not explain why the article is in an exceptionaly poor state. In fact it was in poor state a while ago before I revised it. And I *WAS* working as technical manager of BEEP! in 2003-2005. I have no economic interest AT ALL in this matter. But because I designed and build a succesfull system I have the knowledge to write about the subject. And I do invite other people with knowledge to contribute. So I do not see any problem with the text. I think I will write more on current developments now and then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HugoBeunder (talk • contribs) 23:10, 19 October 2018 (UTC) Besides, this company, Beep!, was shut down around the end of 2007. It doesn't exist since 11 years. It is history. And I hapen to know a bit of this history as an insider. Is there some WIKIPEDIA rule that insiders cannot write about a subject? That would be very stupid. I added references and links to public sources on the internet. Everything I wrote can be checked. This was the birth of mobile ticketing! — Preceding unsigned comment added by HugoBeunder (talk • contribs) 23:40, 19 October 2018 (UTC)