Talk:Mobile deep linking

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 17 September 2013 by reviewer Anupmehra (talk · contribs).

Untitled

OneLink is both at "Standard" and "OneStandard".. so what is it going to be? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.153.211.65 (talk) 09:17, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

I think Deferred deep linking should be merged into this article. It is an offshoot and would be better directed here. Desertarun (talk) 19:06, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance of Play Store

The deferred deep linking section speaks of the Play Store as if it is installed on only an insignificant number of devices, citing the total global installs. This is only when including China, which bans Play Store and has alternative stores that are commonplace. Realistically, for an app targeting any non-Chinese market and distributed only on the Play Store, it is fairly common to assume Play Store and Play Services are available. The alternative given next in the list, Facebook, is also banned in China. I think would be helpful to rephrase this section in the context of apps targeting a Western audience. Einsidler (talk) 05:57, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]