Talk:Mobile Suit Gundam SEED C.E. 73: Stargazer
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Cleanup
[edit]Wait a second...what abbreviations are used that need cleaning up? Besides DSSD, which is cleary explained in the article, the only other abbreviations I see are SEED, ONA, and OVA, of which anyone searching for this should known.
Also, why remove all of the character information, or at least why not link it to the CE Character page with that information. The information comes from Japanese magazines and has been posted in a variety of places, including 2ch and other news-breaking sites.
- Copyright violation, taken from aeug.blogspot.
Name Spelling
[edit]Shouldn't "Sven Cal Bayan" be "Sven Cal Bayang"? The Strike Noir model kit manual spells it this way, and I've never seen any other official source spell it as "Bayan". DarkWarrior 19:26, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
But thats not always right, and the Japanese are known to get incorrect spellings of many things in the Gundam animes, such as "Valcan Gun" and "Beam Sabel" from Gundam Seed Phase-01. And If I read correctly, doesn't that model kit also call Strike Noir as the Strike Noir Gundam? yet it is not a Gundam. Dudeman74 01:28, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Same with "Gundam Astray Red Frame", "Akatsuki Gundam", etc. Gundams sell better than non-Gundams, so they're pretty liberal with the usage of "Gundam" on model kits. Calaschysm 14:39, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Yes, the official Stargazer website calls them Strike Noir, Verde Buster, and Blu Duel, but the model kits tack on "Gundam" at the end. But that's not the issue I'm talking about. Unless there is an official source that spells it "Bayan", the name "Sven Cal Bayang" is the only official spelling I've seen, so I believe we should go with Bayang. Any thoughts? As far as I known, Bayan is just a rough translation made by fans, and not the official spelling. DarkWarrior 14:53, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Bayang does seem to be the official spelling, but "Bayan" isn't what I'd call a rough translation, as it's a perfect translation of the characters used. Ba-ya-n. Calaschysm 20:49, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
I'm going to change Bayan to Bayang since nobody can provide any source that Bayan is the official spelling. Yes, Bayan is the correct translation of the characters used, but so is Asuran.. but how many people use that spelling? Most people use the official spelling. If there are any problems, please leave a comment here. DarkWarrior 01:31, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
I never said it was Bayang, just disagreed with the usage of "rough translation." Calaschysm 01:41, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Well in all actuality. Most Gundams are identified due to the very first Gundam ever. The characteristic that usually sets a Gundam apart from most MS is the V fin that appears on its forehead. Although this isn't always the case for all Gundams. Turn A Gundam had the V fin on it's mouth making it look like a mustache. And ofcourse there's also the fact that Strike Noir's OS sports the acronym, General Unilateral Neuro-Link Dispersive Autonomic Maneuver. Isn't that where Kira got the name "Gundam."
ZAFT MS
[edit]The ZAFT MS do not belong to ZAFT but are rebels who believed in Zala's ideal. These people are the ones attacking EAF bases all over the world.
- Its not even shown that they belonged to the terrorist! Its even possible that Phantom Pain them self have used the GINN. In Destiny it was shown that they had extendet in training during that time. Maybe they picked up 3 of them and threw them into the Ginn to create anti-coordinator feelings. Its clear that an organisation like Phantom pain is capable of killing theire own Soldier (or in this case regular EA soldier) and civilians if its fits theire goals.
Othergrunty. 1.08.2006
Provide some proof if you can. Their ZAFT insurgents who believe in Zala. Nameless 24.08.2006
Stargazer finished?
[edit]Is that all the episodes for Stargazer? Only 3?
OhanaUnited 20:33, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Gsstargazer.jpg
[edit]Image:Gsstargazer.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mobile Suit Gundam SEED C.E. 73: Stargazer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060704154954/http://bandai-hobby.net/gunpla/seed-sg/index.html to http://bandai-hobby.net/gunpla/seed-sg/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:16, 25 January 2018 (UTC)