Talk:Mobile River

This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama articles

Rivers Mid‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Drainage basin rank

I modified the article's statement about the rank of the Mobile's drainage basin. Before my change it said simply "Its drainage basin is the fourth-largest in the United States." My modified statement is "Its drainage basin is the fourth-largest of primary stream drainage basins entirely in the United States." There are many more than three drainage basins entirely or partially in the US that are larger than the Mobile's, there are many more than three drainage basins entirely in the US that are larger than the Mobile's, and there are many more than three drainage basins of primary streams entirely or partially in the US that are larger than the Mobile's. But there may not be more than three drainage basins of primary streams entirely in the US that are larger than the Mobile's. In fact I've only been able to identify two -- those of the Kuskokwim and Brazos. So my modified wording may not be accurate either, but it's at least possible. Oelrich (talk) 15:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, this page lists some rivers by drainage basin size. It puts the Mobile at 44,600 sqmi. The Brazos and Kuskokwim are larger. And it cites the Atchafalaya River as including the drainage basin of the Red River (Mississippi watershed), since most of the Red empties into the Atchafalaya instead of the Mississppi. The Atchafalaya empties directly into the sea. If that counts, the draiange basin of the Atchafalaya-Red is 95,100 sqmi. Other than those, I can't see any others larger than the Mobile. The portion of the Colorado River basin in Mexico is so small it seems almost unfair to disqualify it. And the Mississippi would count if you didn't include the Missouri! But oh well. Anyway, I suppose that USGS page could be used as a reference source for this claim, even if it is not stated explicitly. Also I assume by "primary river" you mean one that empties into the sea. Perhaps that should be said more clearly? Pfly (talk) 16:59, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mobile River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:24, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]