Talk:Mobile Magazine

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Blogging (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blogging, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BloggingWikipedia:WikiProject BloggingTemplate:WikiProject BloggingBlogging articles

Future Network actually closed down Mobile because of lackluster performance on the newsstand, not lack of subscriber support. In fact, the magazine had incredible support from subscribers -- I don't recall the exact figures, but it was north of 100,000 subscribers, many of whom were very loyal, supportive, and vocal in their support.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dtweney (talk • contribs).

Thanks for this information, Dtweney! You wouldn't by any chance have a source for that statement?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:56, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can we get some mention on the actual "Mobile Magazine" who owns the trademark and website since 2001? www.mobilemag.com where is the due dillegence on this one? -mike —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.69.56.29 (talk) 17:59, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Logo

Not sure if it meets NFCC, so here is just a link to the logo (updated August 2015). Vivrax (talk) 21:43, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]