Talk:Mitsubishi Ki-67

File:Ki67OnGround.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Ki67OnGround.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:51, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Ki67InFlight.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Ki67InFlight.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:51, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Ki67Pilot.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Ki67Pilot.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:52, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Navy designation.

I was curious about the navy designation, since "Ki-xx" is only used by the Army. I figured it would be GxM or PxM, as per G4M and P1Y (Japanese military aircraft designation systems...hadn't realized that they used a single number sequence across all manufacturers, unlike the US, so you would never get an "A6M" and an "A6K" (ie F4F vs F4U in the USN)...there can only be one "A6", regardless of manufacturer. Anyway, didn't take long to get a hit for a "P2M Hiryu", the Ki-67 being the second "P" type bomber accepted after the P1Y. Here is the page: http://tbo.wikidot.com/airlists-jnbm. I'm going to mention it in the intro, but it would be nice to have it listed in the "variants" after the Q2M ("Q" for patrol plane).45Colt 05:40, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

The page appears to be some sort of alternate history website - note how it talks about the type being in use until 1953 and the long list of increasingly fiction types, including supersonic thermonuclear armed manned kamakaze aircraft. Not exactly a reliable source.Nigel Ish (talk) 18:45, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Here we go - [1] "This website is a work of fiction set in an alternative universe...." Nigel Ish (talk) 18:48, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mitsubishi Ki-67. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060822090107/http://www.ijaafpics.com/jbwki671.htm to http://www.ijaafpics.com/jbwki671.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:20, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Indonesia?

I can't seem to find any support for the Hiryu serving in the Indonesian Air Force. This was added by an IP back in 2013, and has never been referenced. Jos Heyman makes no mention of a Ki-67 anywhere in his monograph on Indonesian aviation, which makes me doubt the veracity of this. I am placing a {{cn}} tag for the time being, but hopefully someone has evidence of a Hiryu in AURI service because that would be really cool.  Mr.choppers | ✎  02:45, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Removing since no one has come forth in 5 months.  Mr.choppers | ✎  01:45, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

two different bomb carrying capacities listed

There are two different bomb carrying capacities listed for the Hiryu, which one is it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:569:585A:4200:4158:8FEF:15C1:584 (talk) 18:09, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

I see 800kg and 1070kg, is that what you're referring to? 800kg is for the type IB, it is not specified which version could carry 1070kg. Perhaps we should find out.  Mr.choppers | ✎  01:45, 24 December 2023 (UTC)