Talk:Mitsubishi Galant Lambda

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I'm about ready to move this article to Mitsubishi Galant Lambda so that the page is named after the domestic market model and Mitsubishi Sapporo redirects to it. Currently Mitsubishi Galant Lambda is a redirect page with a one line edit history, so as per WP:MOVE it's OK to overwrite a page like this without admin intervention.

The current article also seems to have been very Plymouth Sapporo-centred (they were merged on 04:12, April 26, 2005, but obviously not rewritten). I've tried to make it more model-neutral, and I've also deleted most of the content about the unreliability of the mechanicals. Aside from the fact that there's no citations to support this, when I went looking for corroboration/contradiction I found the Allpar.com page on the Plymouth, where owners' testimonies seem to indicate that it suffered none of the problems referred to here.

Therefore, my rewrite, currently at User:DeLarge/Galant Lambda, will be copy/pasted here and then the page will be moved/redirected, unless there's any dissenting voices. --DeLarge 21:49, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agree - I definetly support the move. I wonder why it wasn't renamed sooner... --ApolloBoy 00:33, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, will move it now. --DeLarge 09:48, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Second infobox

There's absolutely nothing in the second infobox at present to justify its existence. A copyvio image which will shortly be deleted, some circular redirects, and duplication of what's already in the first infobox. What is it about this car that some people think the same thing needs to be said twice or three times on multiple pages? --DeLarge (talk) 13:22, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

///////////////////////////// There are two very distinct generations of this car with completely different bodies. The image that you removed is NOT a copyvio image. There is no copyright claim anywhere in the owners manual. And the image and all the information in the owners manual are intended by the manufacturer to accompany the car and be used to describe the car.

If there is a concern about redundancy, I think this page should be merged with the Galant page.GalantFan (talk) 20:17, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mitsubishi Galant Lambda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:26, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]