Talk:Mitsubishi F1M

Military history: Aviation / Asian / Japanese

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Japan: Military history Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 05:06, November 22, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

According to these photos this aircraft is ready for flying only after being left 50 years under water 8-)

Engine?

It says 'the F1M1 was built with the 830hp Nakajima Hikari 9 cylinder radial", but then in the infobox it says that it has a 875hp Mitsubishi Zuisei 14 cylinder twin-row radial engine of 875hp. These are quite different engines, and a plane switching from a Hikari to a narrow-diameter Zuisei would need a certain amount of alteration in the cowling, etc. Does this mean the four F1M1 prototypes were given Hikari engines, while the F1M2 and all the other production aircraft were given the more powerful and modern Zuisei? This would fit in with what happened to a number of other Japanese aircraft of the era. If this is the case, it should be clearer that most of the aircraft were NOT built with Hikari engines, which is the first thing a reader will assume when they read the sentence saying that "the F1M1 was built with the Hikari engine", in the absence of anything to make them think otherwise. Wikipedia article reading shouldn't be about having the proper deductive skills and being observant enough to glean out all the information that ISN'T stated in between all the strangely random facts that seem to make the cut. 70.109.132.119 (talk) 05:09, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Hikari was only used by the F1M1, and was one of the considerable package of changes (also new wings, bigger tail) made to turn the aircraft into something that met the IJN's needs. It looks like someone started to write about the development of the aircraft and then run out of steam - I'll see if I can expand it a bit.Nigel Ish (talk) 18:34, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Surviving examples

Are there any surviving examples of this aircraft? PrussianOwl (talk) 11:57, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]