Talk:Mitsubishi F-X

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mitsubishi F-X article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 31 May 2020 by reviewer Sulfurboy (talk · contribs).

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / Asian / Japanese

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force

Japan: Military history / Science & technology / Update Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 21:08, November 25, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force.

This article is supported by the Science and technology task force.

This article is supported by the Update task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

404 error on Reference 74 and unsubstantiated political claim…

Reference 74 points to a 404 error and needs to be removed. Also there is no reference for the claim “ the decision to joint-develop the aircraft with the US was later chosen due to a combination of US political pressure and the heavy undertaking of producing a fighter domestically.” and appears to be an unfounded claim on “political pressure” and should be removed. I did not edit as others are working on this pace as recently as just last month and would like to leave it to them to correct. CAG0001 (talk) 09:36, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Its pretty substantiated, e.g. this article in the Financial Times. WatcherZero (talk) 10:52, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.ft.com/content/a024eeec-1b08-11ea-97df-cc63de1d73f4

Design /"Power" systems: translation of "Power" from Japanese - clarification needed

The electric actuators are used in the fighter's flight control systems, power systems and undercarriage/wheel braking systems.

It is unclear what is referred to by the term "Power" systems. This sentence in the article is translated from a source in Japanese (which I don't speak). It is plausible that a word translated into English as "Power" might refer to:

engines
electrical generators
an APU setup
batteries (although it seems unlikely that these would require any electric actuators)
perhaps it may even refer to the fuel system, i.e. pumps and valves etc (if it is a similar word in Japanese; or if the concept is that fuel feeds the engines, which power the aircraft)
something else.

It is also unclear what part of such system(s) (e.g. engines, generators, APU) etc might have an electric actuator).

Could someone who speaks Japanese please have a read of the source below and clarify what "Power" systems refers to? https://web.archive.org/web/20190414090031/https://www.mod.go.jp/atla/research/gaibuhyouka/pdf/Elec_Actuator_29.pdf

The slides appear to be from a presentation on the evaluation of switching from hydraulic actuators (powered from a central hydraulic reservoir) to electrical actuators in the control surfaces, landing gear, and brakes to allow more freedom in aircraft body design. The 'power system' its referring to is the transformer taking energy from the engine, converting to DC and then supplying to the individual electrical actuators around the aircraft. After examining traditional Hydraulics, electrically powered mechanical actuators or electrically powered hydraulic actuators it recommends the electrical powered hydraulic actuators as the preferred system. WatcherZero (talk) 22:23, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]