Talk:Mitsubishi 380

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mitsubishi 380 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

POV

I've added the POV-check tag, as stated above the article does seem to have an anti-Mitsubishi bias, espicially the whole "Causes of poor sales" section. --Richmeister 08:18, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the aforementioned section, as it came off as POV and was mostly unverifiable. --ApolloBoy 05:16, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

380?

Why does the article "380 (number)" redirect here? I know it should go to a list of 300 numbers but this isn't right to link here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by C-Star (talk • contribs) 20:40, November 4, 2006

Other Models

Can someone upload a pic of the GT or VRX? Much better looking in my opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.166.239.21 (talk • contribs) 03:09, August 5, 2007

If there is a pic in existence that does not violate copyright, then it could happen. Anyway, on articles it is better to use either base trim models or flagship models of the car, rather than a sport model which can have its own section to accompany the picture, talking about the performance etc. HarrisonB Speak! 09:15, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mitsubishi 380. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090320113933/http://www.mitsubishi-motors.com/corporate/ir/share/pdf/e/fact_2008.pdf to http://www.mitsubishi-motors.com/corporate/ir/share/pdf/e/fact_2008.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:14, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mitsubishi 380. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:23, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]