Talk:Mitre Peak (New Zealand)

New Zealand Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mountains Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mitre Peak - Tararua Range

Should this be mentioned as well being the highest peak in the range — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.144.32.165 (talk • contribs) 13 September 2006 (UTC)

No. This is the article about the mountain in Fiordland. If you think that the other mountains or hills of this name deserve a page (I believe there are four peaks called "Mitre Peak" in New Zealand), feel free to write those articles. And since your post, somebody else has already given that Tararua Range hill a short article, but note that it's not one of the other three "Mitre Peaks"; its name is simply Mitre. Schwede 66 22:50, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

History merge

@Jackmcbarn: Regarding the requested history merge, I have to admit that I struggle a bit with the concept. However, Mitre Peak (New Zealand) has just been deleted to make way for a page move from Mitre Peak, New Zealand. Hence, the history that shows with this article is the one that came with the move. What's missing is the previous history of the now deleted article. My understanding is that these things need to be merged. Or am I misunderstanding something? Schwede 66 03:28, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Schwede66: There were only 2 revisions that were deleted, and both were redirects rather than relevant article history, so they're not worth restoring. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:32, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok - thanks. Schwede 66 03:35, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]