Talk:Mississippi Highway 607/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 22:26, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.
If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)
I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.
Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)
Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.
Links
[edit]Prose
[edit]Lede
[edit]- Lede is a little short - could we bulk it up a little? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Because it's the main piece of info as to what the article is - can we link highway in the lede? In the UK for example, this has a different meaning (we'd say dual carriageway or motorway). Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Linked the specific article. Nova Chrysalia (Talk) 19:03, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- southern terminus - could we say this a bit more simply? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- U.S. Route 90 (US 90) - we then shorten similar roads, without having defined them, like US 11. Is there a better way to do this? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Maintained by MDOT in infobox isn't strictly cited in body. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)- I actually think this bit is good info for the lede. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
General
[edit]- INFINITY Science Center pipes to a redirect. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Done, title must've changed since. Nova Chrysalia (Talk) 19:03, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Signage for MS 607 at I-59's exit 1 - quite a poor caption. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Could we get some alt text? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- The History section could probably be written a bit less frantically, and explain a bit more that the road is the remnants of US 90. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- The History doesn't seem extremely clear when the road became the 607 - 1967? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- External links doesn't have any links, just a portal, can probably cull. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Review meta comments
[edit]- I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:26, 5 September 2021 (UTC)