Talk:Mississippi Highway 604/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 01:01, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
In the route description, I would switch the order of the paragraphs to have the description of the route progession to be first and the traffic count/NHS/code/scenic byway paragraph be second.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
There is {{Mississippi road map}} for which the maps can be templaticized with.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
In the route description, you should mention how many lanes the route is and whether it is divided or not.

Any road names for MS 604?

What kind of "buffer zone" is near Pearlington?

When was this road originally built and when was it initially designated as US 90?
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I will place the article on hold for a few concerns to be addressed. Dough 48 72 01:11, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Dough4872: All issues fixed except the references and road name, since there isn't one.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 17:20, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You still don't provide a date of when the road was initially built and designated as US 90. Dough 48 72 21:06, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

With that issue addressed, and some factual fixes I applied myself, I will now pass the article. Dough 48 72 03:13, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]