Jump to content

Talk:Mississippi Highway 602/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TheWombatGuru (talk · contribs) 23:07, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    Good summary. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    b (MoS):
    Hancock County, Mississippi, Pearl River County, Mississippi and John C. Stennis Space Center are all three linked two times; the two counties are also linked in the infobox and the major intersections sections. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Removed a link for the space center. The other two are okay, AFAIK.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 00:23, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    Used reliable logs with an additional map. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    Why was the route removed from the state highway system? TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Can't find sources for that...can't really interpret more than what's on the map.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 17:56, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    No photographs are present. (photographs of still standing route markers, old photographs if available?) TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Pictures of roads in Mississippi (that are useable) are extremely rare...and there aren't any for this one.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 00:44, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Usually they're not required at GA, though we do encourage nominators to try and find some if possible. --Rschen7754 04:34, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Not really a comment to this article, but the line of text in the Major intersection section could easily be added to Jcttop as it probably appear in a lot of articles in the same grammatical construction. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is my first ever review, of course it will need additional reviewers, but I want to learn this stuff, so I thought, let's try it. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:07, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@TheWombatGuru: All issues resolved.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 00:44, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@CycloneIsaac: Well, then it looks like a Good Article to me. It probably needs another reviewer though, since this was my first review. TheWombatGuru (talk) 12:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It seems fine for GA, though it wouldn't progress any further. --Rschen7754 20:15, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]