Jump to content

Talk:Mississippi Highway 469

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Mississippi Highway 469/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 04:37, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.

Grammar: MS 469, known as South Church Street inside the town,[7] intersecting multiple driveways and an entrance to a park.

Fixed. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 04:58, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. Pending
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
2c. it contains no original research.
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.

Earwig shows clean

3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.

File:Ellipse sign 469.svg - looks good

6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

No pics on Commons or otherwise freely available?

I wish there were. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 04:58, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
7. Overall assessment.

@Kees08: Fixed. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 04:58, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]