Talk:Mississippi Highway 389

Mississippi Highway 389 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 13, 2020. (Reviewed version).

U.S. Roads: State highways / Mississippi Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	Mississippi
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mississippi Highway 389/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 22:12, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Kingsif, and I'll be doing this review. This is an automated message that helps keep the bot updating the nominated article's talkpage working and allows me to say hi. Feel free to reach out and, if you think the review has gone well, I have some open GA nominations that you could (but are under no obligation to) look at. Kingsif (talk) 22:12, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Talk page and article history look stable
One licensed commons image
Various tables and infobox used as standard for highway articles
No evidence of copyvio
Lead a fair length - the two paragraphs are quite chunky so maybe a little long, but fine
Some redlinks, but for articles that would be useful, so also fine

Don't think anyone would delete them if they get created. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 07:22, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not a wide variety of sources (mostly the Mississippi governance and Google maps) but they are official and satisfactory coverage for the subject in this case - if there is more 'pop' history that might be relevant, an admittedly quick search hasn't found it
Remove wikilink to Martin Luther King Jr. from Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Drive - King is not the road; if there is an article for things named after King, that may be a more appropriate target – also link MS 182 earlier in the sentence

Done. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 07:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

comma between facilities including

Added. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 07:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Route description generally seems fine
Some connective is needed after the comma in The sections near Pheba and in Chickasaw County were paved in asphalt, the remaining sections were laid with gravel (or change it to a semi-colon)

Added "and". Nova Crystallis (Talk) 07:22, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The phrasing of projects to construct three bridges and grading, drainage, and gravel surfacing along 3.4-mile (5.5 km) section of MS 389 makes it a little strange to read, mostly because of the different verb forms in "to construct" and "grading" etc. Just adding a 'for' in front of "grading" would fix that, but the various actions could be rearranged to improve it further

Made the easier fix. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 07:22, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

the route was rerouted - maybe the "route" could become 'road' to avoid close repetition?

Done. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 07:22, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Needs a period after and MS 46

Fixed. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 07:22, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems neutral
Everything has at least one appropriate ref

Overall

On hold A few things, but generally a fine, short, US road article. I don't see any lack in coverage, so it should be good with tweaks mentioned above. Kingsif (talk) 22:30, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kingsif: Thanks for the review. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 07:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]