Talk:Mississippi Highway 350/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: TheWombatGuru (talk · contribs) 22:55, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
- The last two sentences of the intro both start with the route; the first part of the route description is fact after fact, it didn't really feel like a story. TheWombatGuru (talk) 22:55, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Changed the word, and the first part of the route description can't really be moved to other parts of the article.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 23:58, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- The last two sentences of the intro both start with the route; the first part of the route description is fact after fact, it didn't really feel like a story. TheWombatGuru (talk) 22:55, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
- b (citations to reliable sources):
- c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
- Maybe there's something to be said about the Tishomingo County Game Refuge? TheWombatGuru (talk) 22:55, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Other than being in the same county, there's no relation with the route.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 23:58, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Doesn't it pass through it? Google might be lying to me. TheWombatGuru (talk) 00:03, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- Google lied to me. TheWombatGuru (talk) 00:28, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- Doesn't it pass through it? Google might be lying to me. TheWombatGuru (talk) 00:03, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- Other than being in the same county, there's no relation with the route.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 23:58, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Why isn't it included as a part in the NHS? TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:03, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- USDOT usually doesn't say why a route is not in the system.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 23:58, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Maybe there's something to be said about the Tishomingo County Game Refuge? TheWombatGuru (talk) 22:55, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- It seems well written again, if the points I addressed are (if they should be) fixed, it may be passed. TheWombatGuru (talk) 22:55, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
