Talk:Mississippi Highway 24/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 23:45, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

I will review this article after the Super Bowl. –TCN7JM 23:45, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Starting review now, also going to add a KML. –TCN7JM 22:06, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Lead/Infobox

• The lead states that the route is 76.3 miles long, but the infobox says 76.0. Which is correct?

• Fixed. Dough4872 04:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Route description

• Subject-verb agreement issues in the first sentence of the second paragraph.

• Fixed. Dough4872 04:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

• I'm seeing a lot of inconsistency in verbs used after subjects that include multiple highways such as "MS 24/MS 33." Either use a plural verb throughout the entire article or a singular one.

• Made consistent. Dough4872 04:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

• I wasn't going to comment on this, but it's bugging me more and more as I read the article. Similar to the PA Tpk. ACR, you have a lot of [verb]ing uses after commas that can easily be changed. History, too.

• Changed. Dough4872 04:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

History

• Is it possible to split the first paragraph in two to get rid of the large block of text?

• Split. Dough4872 04:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Major intersections

• You use concurrency throughout the article, but overlap in this section. You should only use one.

• Changed. Dough4872 04:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Final verdict

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The prose is a bit off.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   No images, so it doesn't really matter

7. Overall: Just a few issues here. –TCN7JM 04:43, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

   Pass/Fail:

Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above comments. Dough4872 04:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Not a problem. I'm passing the article. Good job! –TCN7JM 04:58, 5 February 2013 (UTC)