Talk:Missed approach
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 21 May 2005. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
VfD (2005)
[edit]On May 21, this article was nominated for deletion. The discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Missed approach. The result was keep. —Xezbeth 06:55, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
Status
[edit]I re-incarnated this article, as it was incorrectly redirected to go-around. I see a message here that it was trans-wikied to wikitionary, but I couldn't find it there. In any case, I don't think the important subject of 'missed approach' can be squeezed into a dictionary entry; it clearly merits its own article. If someone knows more about this, please comment. I copied the Talk-archive redirect to here. Crum375 19:52, 21 September 2006 (UTC)