Talk:Miss Sixty

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Major issues with this article

I've just added the multiple issues tag to the top of the article, as there are some relatively large outstanding issues with the contents as current. Here's a breakdown of the tags I've added:

Additional citations

This article currently has three. Though this isn't out of the norm for a stub-class article, the entirety of the History section has just one citation, which is low compared to the relatively decent size of the section. There's a lot of information in there that needs to be shown to come from more than one source.

Tone and style

The tone of this article reads like an advert. The fact that the lead states it offers "womenswear with a seductive touch" is not the tone used in Wikipedia articles. The rest of the article is just as bad; I actually think selected revisions from over a decade ago do a better job of the article than its current contents, which is saying something.

COI editing

The above both contribute to conflict of interest editing, but there's a few select users in the article's history that especially stand out. These are 5.89.16.50 and GHT68, whose only edits have been to this article. Their contributions have not done anything to convince me this isn't COI editing at work.

I'm leaving this here as I'm required to through tagging the article, at the risk of simply conducting drive-by tagging. At a later date, either I - or hopefully, someone else, hopefully much quicker - will dig through the revisions of this article and find the contributions that contribute actual worth to this article. --Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 22:14, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]