Talk:Miss Hong Kong 2021
This page was proposed for deletion by Sun8908 (talk · contribs) on 13 May 2021. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 18 May 2021
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: (non-admin closure) Procedural close. There is enough support for the article being in namespace that it should not be draftified unilaterally, and the proper forum for discussion of a draftification or deletion is WP:AFD. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 18:54, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Miss Hong Kong 2021 → Draft:Miss Hong Kong 2021 – The article does not have sufficient content to have an article of its own Eight96Four (talk) 03:00, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose all confirmed upcoming competition events such as upcoming beauty pageants and upcoming sporting events such as Olympics have wikipedia pages. As you can see Miss Universe 2021, which is next year's Miss Universe, has a page even though the last Miss Universe Miss Universe 2020 literally just took place just only yesterday. It has sufficient significance being the most recent and current edition of a beauty pageant.Yeungkahchun (talk) 04:59, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- OPPOSE: Major events such as this will have wiki pages.Kaneki00(talk)
- Comment: @Eight96Four:
If you wish to draftify an article, you can do it yourself without going through a move request. (Use a tool like User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.) Anyone who objects to the draftification may move it back to the main namespace, at which point the article should go through a discussion (article talk page or AfD) before being draftified again.In this case, there are users opposing this move, so you may no longer draftify this article yourself.Consider withdrawing this request as RM is not the correct place to evaluate notability, and list it on AfD if you still believe it is not notable. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 09:17, 18 May 2021 (UTC)- @Eight96Four: Previous ping failed. Re-pinging. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 09:20, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Strike: Nevermind, you are already aware of that. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 09:23, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I second Aseleste. It went through PROD and an attempted draftification process. I am of the opinion that this will survive a CSD as well. Thus, shouldn't the next step be AfD? RM is not the right process for this. – robertsky (talk) 21:53, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Oppose
[edit]Major events, such as this will have wiki pages. Kaneki00 (talk) 06:31, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Is this really a major event? Eight96Four (talk) 11:22, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Why does it matter to you if this event has a page, is it going to make you cry? Kaneki00 (talk) 22:33, 22 May 2021 (UTC)