Talk:Misfortunes (album)

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 March 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

Requested move 13 July 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. A separate RM should probably be started for deciding whether the fairy tale is the primary topic. Jenks24 (talk) 16:26, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Misfortunes → Misfortunes (album) – Misfortune is the primary topic of Misfortunes. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:53, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support for the same reason parachutes and moved to Parachutes (album).--67.68.29.1 (talk) 13:29, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - pageviews show no evidence of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Misfortune has more views, but not substantially so. WP:SMALLDETAILS would be preferred over parenthetical disambiguation in this situation. Sovereign Sentinel (talk) 14:59, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:PLURALPT. Note that there is no article on the concept of "misfortune" - there is a folk tale called Misfortune and a recently created disambiguation page. Dohn joe (talk) 15:30, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We don't do this, Talk:Bookends (album) Talk:Parachutes (album) etc etc. Who has been editing WP:PLURALPT then? In ictu oculi (talk) 17:50, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Snickers, Friends, Windows, etc etc. We do this when it's appropriate and when there's consensus. Dohn joe (talk) 18:21, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes and those are the 3 exceptions which are stuck because they are notable, this isn't. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:34, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong support per nom; the album is clearly not a primary topic, it doesn't even show up in the first page of google results ; however, the topic at "Misfortune" is also not a primary topic. Instead this page, and "misfortune" should both be the same disambiguation page. -- 67.70.32.20 (talk) 06:18, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- To elaborate : Misfortune -> Misfortune (fairy tale) ; Misfortune (disambiguation) -> Misfortune ; Misfortunes -> Misfortunes (album) ; then repoint "Misfortunes" -to- "Misfortune" (which will have become a disambiguation page) -- 67.70.32.20 (talk) 06:21, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Support as per this comment. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:24, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Support suggestion by 67.70.32.20. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:51, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Support as per this comment Misfortune -> Misfortune (fairy tale) ; Misfortune (disambiguation) -> Misfortune In ictu oculi (talk) 11:33, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:PLURALPT and WP:SMALLDETAILS. I see no benefit to either redirecting the current title to the Italian fairy tale Misfortune or to the dab page, which doesn't include anything else ambiguous with the plural "misfortunes".--Cúchullain ^t/c 16:21, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There's actually no other article titled *either* "Misfortune" or "Misfortunes". Misfortune is an article on a fairy tale. The dab page lists "bad luck", but that just redirects to List of unlucky symbols. This is a problem searching for a solution if ever there was one.--Cúchullain ^t/c 16:33, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Misfortunes (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:39, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]