Jump to content

Talk:Mirror symmetry (string theory)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ColonelHenry (talk · contribs) 15:24, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I rarely review articles in math because I try to avoid getting involved in areas of Wikipedia that touch upon my profession, but I couldn't pass this one up. This is a thorough and excellent article, well-prepared, well-sourced, well-formatted, quite comprehensive and informative--and I see that it would be informative for people who would like to know more who would approach this from a comprehension of math comparable with the completion of a good secondary school education. While the language is technical because of its mathematical nature, it is easily accessible. Images checked and without any fair/free content issues. I do not see any issues regarding criteria compliance that would delay promotion to GA. --ColonelHenry (talk) 15:24, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·