Jump to content

Talk:Miracle Man (The X-Files)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleMiracle Man (The X-Files) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starMiracle Man (The X-Files) is part of the The X-Files (season 1) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 11, 2011Good article nomineeListed
January 17, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 12, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that "Miracle Man" was the first episode of The X-Files written by Howard Gordon without his long-term collaborator Alex Gansa?
Current status: Good article

Untitled

[edit]

Anyone know the name of the actress who plays Young Samantha Mulder in this episode? Is not Vanessa Morley ...

Thanks in advance!

Bianca — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bianca23br (talkcontribs) 01:50, 8 September 2007

IMDB has her down as Brianne Benitz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Euchrid (talkcontribs) 08:43, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Miracle Man (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk contribs count) 12:00, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Plot
  • "the horribly-burnt" is subjective, badly/severely burnt?
Production

PLease fix the link from Southern United States to Southern United States English and pipe the whole thing with Southern United States English |Southern United States accent.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:23, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Got both. GRAPPLE X 13:58, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

As sound as a pound. Thanks for your swift response.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:37, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Signs and Wonders

[edit]

Wasn't the name of the church that Calvin presided over "The Church of Signs and Wonders?" Billsnpack (talk) 13:34, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]