Talk:Miraclass

re: Miraclass article

I would like to bring to your attention the notable contributions and achievements of Miraclass, a South Korean crossover quartet.

To provide a comprehensive understanding and facilitate easy access to more information, it would be beneficial to connect this page to the corresponding Korean Wikipedia page (미라클라스).

1. Formation and Achievements
   • Miraclass, formed in 2017 on the JTBC audition program Phantom Singer 2, consists of baritone Julian Jootaek Kim, tenor Phillip Jeong, pop tenor Kang-hyun Park, and bass Tain Han. They achieved runner-up status on Phantom Singer 2, gaining substantial recognition.
2. Discography and Performances
   • The group has released the studio album Romantica, the EP REBOOT, and the singles REBOOT and My Hero. Their work is featured in the compilation albums of Phantom Singer. They have performed in various Phantom Singer concerts and held their own performances. Their participation in Phantom Singer All Stars during the COVID-19 pandemic expanded their fanbase, and they conducted a national tour in 2022. They actively engage with fans through their YouTube channel, launched in 2021.
3. Individual Member Contributions
   • Julian Jootaek Kim: Performed in numerous of operas in Italy and played the Phantom in The Phantom of the Opera musical in South Korea.
   • Phillip Jeong: Released classical albums and made contributions to the classical music genre.
   • Kang-hyun Park: Starred in major musicals such as Kinky Boots, The Man Who Laughs, Mozart!, Hadestown, Memphis, and Dear Evan Hansen in South Korea. He also appeared in TV dramas.
   • Tain Han: Actively produces AOR and animation music in the indie scene, with numerous albums. He is also part of the jazz/easy listening duo "Feel in" with Jeong.

Miraclass's diverse talents and collaborative efforts make them a unique and influential presence in the crossover music scene. Rosuacamus (talk) 10:56, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Please be mindful of WP:PROMOTION. Articles are not meant for praise. 211.43.120.242 (talk) 00:58, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

I will fix the article in 24 hours. Thanks. Rosuacamus (talk) 07:32, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

I have read the article Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and made the following changes to the article accordingly:

1. I deleted promotional phrases and revised sentences to ensure a neutral tone.

2. Another editor corrected the in-line citations and external links. I also reviewed the citations for verification and removed any duplications.

3. I added appropriate categories to the article.

I believe the article now adheres to the neutral and encyclopedic standards of a Wikipedia article. If you still consider further corrections necessary, please let me know. I appreciate your comments, which have greatly helped me improve the article. Rosuacamus (talk) 02:29, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

It's better, but there's still sentences here and there that feel POV. For example, "The tour not only showcased beloved songs that have been popular among fans but also featured individual performances by each of the four members.", "provided a diverse musical experience", and "These activities added variety and entertainment value, showcasing the members' versatility and camaraderie". The latter two are subjective claims made in wikipedia's voice. We're not supposed to judge what is diverse, or what is versatile etc. If you attribute those opinions to notable people that's ok, but not in Wikipedia's voice.

Also, a bunch of statements are unsourced. 211.43.120.242 (talk) 00:18, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your valid point. I am currently on a business trip for a week. Once I have the opportunity after the trip, I will review the article again to ensure it is neutral and free of any promotional language. I appreciate your time and feedback. I will provide a response once I have completed the revisions. Rosuacamus (talk) 18:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

I went through the article and deleted any promotional and non-neutral wording. I also added more citations to validate the claims in the article. I understand that the article is now in adequate form as a Wikipedia article. If you still consider further corrections necessary, please let me know. Rosuacamus (talk) 10:29, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

You did a great job, thanks for being receptive to the feedback! 104.232.119.107 (talk) 23:11, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your critical readthrough. It was a good learning experience. Have a good one! Rosuacamus (talk) 00:09, 1 August 2024 (UTC)