Talk:Mirabito Outdoor Classic/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 19:41, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will begin reviewing the article as soon as I can.--Dom497 (talk) 19:41, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
Quality of article is good.

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Article agrees with the Manual of Style.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
Checked sources and everything looks good.

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
Every sentence in the article has at least one reference/source.

C. No original research:
No original research found.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
Article cover all the important/major content about the topic.

B. Focused:
Article stays on topic at all times and has a consistent "flow".
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
No bias found.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Took a look at the article history and everything looks stable.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
All images in the article are tagged and licensed properly.

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Pictures are good but in my opinion, a picture what the stadium looked liked inside during the event would be great to add, yet at the same time it may be hard to find one.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Please see 6B for more info on what can be improved in the article. Also, if a picture of the inside of th stadium can't be found, this article is still worthy of a pass.--Dom497 (talk) 20:27, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree, but unfortunately I could not find any free images. I am under the impression that any non-free images would not pass fair use. I did see some images on flickr that weren't properly licensed but I'll try contacting the users to see if they would be willing to change them for use on WP. I have never had any luck with this in the past and so I wouldn't hold my breath on this, most users never even give a reply.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 15:38, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 15:38, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to say that you will be able to find a picture so I will pass the article right now!--Dom497 (talk) 20:32, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well I certainly hope so. Thanks again for the review and the pass.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 21:31, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]