Talk:MirCorp

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the MirCorp redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Spaceflight: Space stations Mid‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by the space stations working group.

Companies

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Begin clean up

This article apparently has been in this shape for some time. It's largely unsourced opinion and editorializing, and it reads as though it was copied and pasted from a newspaper or similar publication. I've tried to delete the more egregious examples of unsourced editorializing. I think the sourcing for much of the opinions, etc., is "out there" somewhere; it would just be easier if the sourcing had been provided at the time the material was inserted in the article. Famspear (talk) 20:15, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sabotaged by Americans

"yield to the American pressures and deorbit the station"

Americans sabotaging other countries' high tech. No, that never happens, cough Concorde... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.6.235.33 (talk) 16:11, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed tag abuse

I never see a article on wikipedia full of this tags. I think the article is not a problem, the problem is people that full the article with those tags. But this kind of practices only show that the way to discredit others work. Not to state that there are no references. Very bad. 2800:370:9C:6760:2164:1304:E16:7ADA (talk) 16:44, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]