Talk:Mint 400
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
yay for 24.24.120.143! Rajanala83 20:36, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
Copy-Pasted
[edit]Big sections copy-pasted from http://www.themint400.com/history.htm 76.201.155.80 (talk) 04:35, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Link on Sunrise Mountain
[edit]I have removed the link on Sunrise Mountain in the Mint 400 article as clicking on it will redirect to Killington Ski Resort, due to the fact that there is a Sunrise Mountain in Killington. The Sunrise Mountain mentioned in Mint 400 article has nothing to do with Killington. If there is an article created on the Sunrise Mountain mentioned on Mint 400 article, feel free to link Sunrise Mountain with that page (NOT Killington Ski Resort). NHRHS2010 | Talk to me 13:57, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
[edit]One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.themint400.com/history.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:09, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Highly subjective wording
[edit]I will leave this for real wiki editors, but this particular portion regarding the temporary hiatus of the race in question is written in an unprofessional and biased sounding manner that is not consistent with the neutrality of Wikipedia articles.
"Unfortunately, two years removed from previous ownership and upper management that were themselves race competitors and motorsport enthusiasts, who understood and appreciated the importance of this event to the sport of off road racing and the local community and; now owned by an individual that once remarked the race, its competitors, tech inspection on Fremont Street and surrounding ancillary activities, was a negative impact on gambling and his Bingo players, the rougest and toughest racing event on U. S. soil was gone following the 1989 Mint 400 event. Considered a motor racing icon, on the level of the SCORE Baja 1000, a legendary event was dead and a historic era in off road racing had come to an untimely end."
Perhaps this should be cleaned up, or one of those 'warnings' about it posted?
184.65.49.60 (talk) 06:48, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Agreed, I've flagged this article disputing it's neutrality. Too much of it sounds like it was written by a PR suit. Jgsampson (talk) 20:07, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Permission problem
[edit]The 2014 rewrite by DesertDingo (talk · contribs) includes the statement:
The first history of the the Mint 400 was included in "The Off-Road Racer (1976)" by Mint creator Norm Johnson. A substantial portion of this listing is culled from the book with the permission of the author
This by itself is not sufficient evidence that the author has granted permission for his work to be re-used here. It also does not make clear what kind of permission has been granted - text at Wikipedia is available for re-use, even for commercial re-use, under a CC-BY-SA license. See the links in the previous copyright message for details.
Without a copy of the book, I cannot tell whether the book's text has been copied here verbatim, or has been summarised or rewritten sufficiently to avoid copyright problems. As a precaution I am restoring the article to its state on 14 May 2014. -- John of Reading (talk) 09:43, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Mint 400. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070105205641/http://www.lasvegassun.com/dossier/misc/loathing/grass.html to http://www.lasvegassun.com/dossier/misc/loathing/grass.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061210051037/http://www.lasvegassun.com/dossier/misc/loathing/vegas.pdf to http://www.lasvegassun.com/dossier/misc/loathing/vegas.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070105205641/http://www.lasvegassun.com/dossier/misc/loathing/grass.html to http://www.lasvegassun.com/dossier/misc/loathing/grass.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061213035351/http://www.lasvegassun.com/dossier/misc/loathing/califpair.pdf to http://www.lasvegassun.com/dossier/misc/loathing/califpair.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061209174859/http://www.lasvegassun.com/dossier/misc/loathing/buggies.pdf to http://www.lasvegassun.com/dossier/misc/loathing/buggies.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070105205641/http://www.lasvegassun.com/dossier/misc/loathing/grass.html to http://www.lasvegassun.com/dossier/misc/loathing/grass.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:28, 1 February 2018 (UTC)