Talk:Minquiers and Ecréhous

Untitled

This article needs a map --AW 19:45, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed territories?

Should these be listed as a piece of disputed territory? --MacRusgail 20:07, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They are not disputed between different states. The French state makes no claim to the territories; the existence of revanchist opinion in some groups in France doesn't make them disputed in that sense, I'd have thought. Man vyi 10:37, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting the article

I wonder whether the time has come to split into Minquiers and Écréhous. Comments? Man vyi 10:37, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now split. Man vyi 07:41, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates

One of these territories is 6 miles North-East of Jersey (49° 13′ 0″ N 2° 7′ 57″ W); the other is 9 miles South. One coordinate (48°58′16″N, 2°04′01″W) can't cover both, surely? Man vyi 07:41, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Minquiers and Ecréhous. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100928092444/http://www.hawaii.edu/aplpj/articles/APLPJ_01.2_heflin.pdf to http://www.hawaii.edu/aplpj/articles/APLPJ_01.2_heflin.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:15, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]