Talk:Minor characters of the Powerpuff Girls

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 February 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

This redirect was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 2017 August 14. The result of the discussion was keep.

I'm proud of this extra article for the powerpuffs. Anything to improve! :)

Cleanup

I removed a number of characters listed here on suspicion of them being fan-fiction; a search on IMDB to see whether the purported voice actors were genuine seems to confirm this, as do the discussions here. Unless someone can come up with some genuine sources for these characters, I'll be treating any edits that re-introduce them as vandalism. Lucky number 49 00:16, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Just making sure no one was being hairtrigger. I'll spell-check. — Madman bum and angel (talk – desk) 03:33, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bunny image.jpg

Image:Bunny image.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:57, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Powerpunkgirls50.JPG

Image:Powerpunkgirls50.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:53, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

During the AfD for this article, it was mentioned that the article should be trimmed and merged back into the main article which I can agree with being the person who nom'd the article. Anyway, any discussion about the merge proposal will take place here. If there's no serious objections raised by the 6th March, the merge will take place. Thanks for your input. --treelo _talk 21:54, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that this page should stay, but there should be many references between the two pages, if anything. The List of powerpuff girls page should be renamed, "Major characters in the powerpuff girls", while this page should keep it's title. That's my input. However, if a merge is very necessary, then by all means, merge it. But I don't think that things are that bad on this minor characters page. WiiDS (talk) 23:30, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The issue I have with minor character lists is one of rampant mediocrity and that if one one-shot nobody character gets a mention then all of them do down to a background character that someone figures re-occurs though only realistically appeared in two scenes. If that happens then it gets out of control and ends up being a huge tarball of junk and cruft nobody wants edit due to its' oversized length before eventually being deleted for being a never ending list about little things not to mention the editwars that could happen over the definitions of "major" and "minor". Keeping the characters in one single list is just easy to edit and maintain and shouldn't get too long if people are prudent about content and infoboxes. treelo _talk 23:58, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that's alright for the time being. I guess we better wait for the waters of vandalists to calm down, before people make a high class page. Plus, a character list is pretty hard to make as a high class Wikipedia page. So I guess just merging it with the other page is best. With that, it might get a star or something like that. Anyway, I say let the merge go on. WiiDS (talk) 13:49, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]