Talk:Ministerial governance

Important concept in Swedish political life

I upgraded the importance scale of this one on the Swedish WkiProject, since this term, although quite quirky in a non-Swedish context, is such an important part of understanding the workings and setup of the executive branch. Not to mention that it is often misinterpreted outside of the legal and political science circles. RicJac (talk) 01:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Does not really deserve high-importance in the wider context of Sweden-related subjects as it is only one narrow aspect of the Constitution of Sweden, albeit an odd one in international context. Tomas e (talk) 12:31, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced, poorly written

I think this is a fairly important article, but it's in a pretty poor state, ATM. I've started doing some research on this topic, and might attempt to improve things soon. Gavleson (talk) 22:03, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Kept this section, even though it is unreferenced:

The reasoning behind this is to prevent government corruption and to ensure that laws and regulations are applied equally. It also motivates the Government and Riksdag to get rid of hard-to-interpret or problematic laws and regulations. There are rare exceptions to this distinction, such as when a natural disaster or war occurs and there is a need for a shorter chain of command.

I might come back later and add sources, if I find any... Gavleson (talk) 15:29, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Government enterprises

The latest addition to this article felt really misplaced (the section is about government agencies, the new text was about companies), so I moved it to the lead for the moment. I'm also noting that its missing citations entirely -- please fix this, and try not to add any unsourced text. Not sure if the text on Akademiska Hus and Vattenfall feels entirely relevant here either, TBH. AFAIK, no one has complained about ministerial rule in connection with the management of these companies, and controversies relating to the government owned companies belongs in the article text of those companies, not here, IMO. Gavleson (talk) 15:35, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ministerstyre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140729184831/http://www.government.se/sb/d/575/a/127133 to http://www.government.se/sb/d/575/a/127133

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]