This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
There were a references in the 3554 Amun article to some material from this book, but it wasn't in this article about this book. So I've copied it over. Since the values Lewis used are out of date (1997), I've added an update from the Platinum article, and copied the link (from that article) to a platinum commodities market price site. Not sure if that counts as original research? -- PaulxSA (talk) 22:19, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Stating that an asteroid contains this and that much of a particular substance; OK. Stating that "it's worth" this and that many million US$ is just ridiculous. Prices change, and markets certainly would be disturbed by that kinds of amounts of material. To first state that shortage of resources is "...an illusion born of ignorance" and then quote market prices (markets = managing scarcity) is just self-contradictory and utterly clueless. Wish I knew how to fix without just deleting the whole crap. --Sigmundur (talk) 04:59, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I agree, and space exploration advocates (of which I admit I am one) do this constantly. I think the point and value of such statements is really to suggest that the asteroidal and other extraterrestrial resources are simply "extremely valuable", likely dwarfing the large (and also poorly known) costs of accessing them. Let's see if some words to make this more clear can be put into the article. Wwheaton (talk) 17:07, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
