Talk:Minimum redundancy feature selection

Robotics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Notability

Hi - this seems to be about one person or group's approach to feature selection, without any secondary sources to show that it is used by anyone else, or influential, etc.

In addition, the text of the page reads as if it was copy-and-pasted from the intro to an academic article.

Please establish notability or delete. Thanks --mcld (talk) 12:07, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Attention needed

Expand
Widen refs to prevent notability problems
Further explain as my additions may not be entirely descriptively correct - I only added one example, that of genetics and phenotype identification

Chaosdruid (talk) 00:46, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Broken Links

External Links 1 and 3 (http://penglab.janelia.org/) are the same and they are broken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:67C:1220:9891:74F9:3F44:1EF7:47D1 (talk) 08:52, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]