Talk:Mini-Microsoft
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mini-Microsoft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131002131259/http://microsoftjobsblog.com/mini-microsoft/ to http://microsoftjobsblog.com/mini-microsoft/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:48, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Effect on reviews
[edit]Fittingly for a an article about a blog concerning shrinking Microsoft's size, I've shrunken this article to a reasonable size and removed comments that had been without sources for 10 years or more. I was unable to find reliable sources to verify the claims that the site was responsible for changes to the company's review process. Please reinstate this info with sources if you can find anything credible. White 720 (talk) 18:08, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- I added some sources that mention review changes around the same time that the blog complained about reviews, although no sources state that the changes were because of the external blog. White 720 (talk) 19:35, 2 July 2022 (UTC)