Talk:Mingus at the Bohemia

Jazz Low‑importance

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Percussion Discussion

The sentence 'Just two men playing two instruments that are very rarely found on the stand alone' is somewhat misleading, since the track includes one of Mingus' most obvious and explicit experiments in overdubbing. Hopefully someone with more time available than I have at the moment could correct this. New York, Fall 1974 (talk) 15:12, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of "The music" section

174.197.209.170 removed the unreferenced section and was advised by Paradise Chronicle to discuss on the talk page. A quick look and I tend to agree with the IP user, the whole section sounds like original research with no references to back it up. (Correction, there is one reference provided in the section but it just confirms that a song was used again.) Greyjoy^talk 11:41, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well as to me it seems uncontroversial content, which mainly describes how the musicians play. You can add a citation needed tag instead of removing it. It seems there are good sources available concerning Mingus at the Bohemia if I read the sources section in the article.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 12:18, 3 September 2020 (UTC)#[reply]

Per WP:UNSOURCED:

Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source.

The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material [its emphasis] Cambial Yellowing❧ 12:33, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to go ahead and remove the section as it is a primarily unsourced opinion/review, if you want to add it back with reliable sources you are welcome to. Greyjoy^talk 05:11, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]