Talk:Mineral, Washington

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.

Tallest Douglas fir grew near Mineral WA

A Douglas fir 393 feet tall once grew near the town, a cross section of the 14 ft diam tree is preserved at the Wind River Arboretum. It is among the tallest trees ever recorded in the World, and possibly the tallest ever well documented. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.175.79.174 (talk) 06:04, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mineral, Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090604021155/http://globaltwitcher.auderis.se/artspec_information.asp?thingid=44736 to http://globaltwitcher.auderis.se/artspec_information.asp?thingid=44736

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:35, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mineral, Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071117021848/http://home.centurytel.net/minerallakewebcam/ to http://home.centurytel.net/minerallakewebcam

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:10, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

YMCA campground on Mineral Lake

I added a brief mention of the YMCA land purchase for a future campground, but it feels as if the topic should be covered in greater detail as it is notable to the Mineral community, Lewis County and the surrounding areas. Yes, there's obvious controversy here (could add a ton more refs on this topics, but start --->)^[1] : support from local tribal councils but strong opposition from residents and recreational enthusiasts. A Mineral resident, or perhaps a Wiki editor with experience in writing about possibly argumentative concerns, can write this up better than an outsider can.

Meanwhile, awesome town, even more awesome people in Mineral! Shortiefourten (talk) 08:27, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Went ahead and added in the info over the last two years. I did the best I could to leave it neutral following WP:UNDUE. I leave it to more experienced editors from the area or know more about the YMCA, zoning, and the Nisqually people to add more if needed.Shortiefourten (talk) 18:50, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ The Chronicle Staff (September 24, 2021). "YMCA Officially Acquires 500 Acres at Mineral Lake". The Chronicle. Retrieved 15 December 2021.

[1] The Chronicle Staff (September 24, 2021). "YMCA Officially Acquires 500 Acres at Mineral Lake". The Chronicle. Retrieved 15 December 2021.

[1]