Talk:MineCam

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 April 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was Withdrawn.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caves, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of caving and cave articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CavesWikipedia:WikiProject CavesTemplate:WikiProject CavesCaves articles

Robotics

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Cleaning up the article

I have made a few edits, mainly to the history section, just to show the sort of things that need to be improved. I removed some of the "narrative", in order to make the tone more encyclopedic (other sections needs to be improved in similar ways). I've marked a few sentences with ^{[citation needed]} tags to give an idea of what kind of statement needs referencing should be used (to give you an idea for the other paragraphs). I'll let you work on the article for a while, contact me if you hit a wall, or are completely lost. Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 10:37, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

'I had missed this talk page so please also see my reply on the AfD page.
Since that reply I have made some more style improvements and added a citation, but there remain some mild assertions I cannot find sources for as they relate to the capabilities and cost of equipment many years ago. Other assertions, such as "9 mm static climbing rope was found to be better than anything thinner, including wire rope, at preventing twist." are the result of experiments made by I.A.Recordings but never written-up, they were just used ad hoc to decide how to proceed. Almost all the factual statements about the construction history are from the first reference, CREG journal No.22. I didn't think it necessary to use the same citation many times in the article, but I could add a few more if that is normal practise. Thanks again, John Logie (talk) 10:36, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MineCam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080605015842/http://www.rapitron.it/archivi/OldindustrcolE.htm to http://www.rapitron.it/archivi/OldindustrcolE.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:02, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]