Talk:Min Young-hwan/GA1

GA Review

Unsuccessful. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:05, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AirshipJungleman29 (talk · contribs) 23:04, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will be quick-failing this good article nomination, as it is a long way from meeting criterion 1 of the good article criteria. The prose is not "clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience with correct spelling and grammar"—there are numerous extremely long paragraphs, the prose is of poor quality with many grammatical errors (notably a lack of understanding of tenses) and a superfluity of repetitive statements in the form of "On [insert date], Min was [insert political action] as [insert political position], etc. Furthermore, it does not comply with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, or words to watch. I would recommend a visit to the Guild of Copy Editors should the nominator desire GA status, along with numerous other improvements. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:04, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.