Talk:Milton Blockhouse/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk · contribs) 16:14, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

I'll take this one, probably over the w/e. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 16:14, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Toolbox check

• Two dabs: pike and porter.
• No EL issues reported.

Prose/content/structure

• Let me know if my copyedit changed any meaning.
• I notice "Device plan" links to Device Forts, which is fine, just want to check if "plan" should be capitalised.
• Level of detail seems fine for this subject -- poor old fort didn't have much of a career, did it?!

Referencing

• Fully cited and sources look reliable.
• Formatting generally seems fine although I think you're using hyphens for page ranges and I believe MOS still favours short dashes.

Images

• Appropriately licensed/captions.
• File:Gravesend defences 1588 Thamesis Descriptio.png doesn't have alt text, although admittedly it's not a requirement.

Look forward to seeing you apply your talents to more articles on Henry's device forts, especially Deal! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Changes should be done now; I think that Device plan is probably OK... Deal is definitely on the list! ;) Hchc2009 (talk) 08:49, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Great -- passing as GA. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:05, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Hey the same can be said for the whole series of Device Fort articles! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC)