Talk:Miloš

There is possible vandalism in this page. In the case of Miloš Zeman, there is no reliable source to call him "fašoun Miloš" (which means "fascist Miloš"). Miloš Zeman is obviously highly divisive figure in the Czech republic. But it has no sense to call any contemporary political figures by derogatory names. Just figure out if Donald Trump would be officially called "fascist Trump". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.178.145.73 (talk • contribs) 14:12, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I already tried removing it twice and it always got reverted. The second time around, I was even accused by Pavol Kru-Pička of being a biased editor with a pro-zemanist agenda and making a self-confessed POV edit. I do have a POV (as stated in the summary), but it's the exact opposite of what the edit (and the guy accusing me) would suggest. And AFAIK, having a POV doesn't matter if one doesn't let it affect their edits.

My edit summaries for reference:

Not true, as evidenced by a simple google search: https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=fašoun+Miloš

Added a space for consistency (also, regarding the previous edit: fašoun translates to fascist and although a lot of people don't like our president (including me), that's not a reason for unsubstantiated allegations)

I'm going to try and remove it for the third time. If it gets reverted again, I am going to have to contact the admins or whatever the procedure is.

Dapil (talk) 23:44, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from further personal accusations. If you'd again try to remove Wikipedia content, please give some real reference instead of your own unsourced claims. Thank you.--Pavol Kru-Pička (talk) 23:42, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The only personal accusation I could find is from you, calling me a biased editor with a pro-zemanist agenda. The burden of proof is on you, as you are the one adding "fašoun Miloš" to this article. This is not an attack on you, I just want this article (and Wikipedia in general) to be non-biased and factual, but unless you provide a source for your claim (which I somehow doubt you can), that's not the case.

Dapil (talk) 08:47, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]