Talk:Miller Analogies Test

Reorganization of Article, Addition of Content

I thought this article was kind of messy, and so I cleaned it up a little bit and added sections headers, reorganizing the content and adding more, clarifying, etc. I also added a link to a document at Harcourt. And I specifically removed the personal anecdotes from people who said that a certain score they received was at a certain percentile. That didn't seem Wikipedia-esque. And besides, percentiles can be determined using the standard deviation of 25 from the center at 400.

But this was my first larger edit on a Wikipedia page, so please let me know if I did anything wrong or violated any rules of etiquette.

I still think the article needs a lot of work, but I am not up to adding more just yet.

Thanks Brianwantium 09:11, 4 August 2007 (UTC)Brianwantium[reply]

scoring?

The article says "Tests taken in October 2004 or later have a score range from 200 to 600."; but current ads for geek community say >66 for 2 percentile, >74 for 1 percentile, mind society say >74. Gzuckier 18:29, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I took the test myself. They no longer use raw scores. You get a score between 200 and 600, and that is what Harcourt has in the official document (the one in the references section). Also, it's probably that the geek community is still accepting pre-Oct2004 scores. -L.

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Miller Analogies Test. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:45, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]