Talk:Millennium Earl

Millennium Earl has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 11, 2017. (Reviewed version).

Anime and manga Low‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Women artists

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on March 28, 2017.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Millennium Earl/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ISD (talk · contribs) 21:30, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I've spotted some things that may want to be changed before being promoted to GA status.

The image in the infobox meets the GA criteria, but you might want to use a clearer, less blurry image.
- Reuploaded. My old computer had bad lightning which made this poor quality.Tintor2 (talk) 22:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Still looks blurry to me. Maybe you might be better off using an image from the manga, like the one you use to depict the character's human form. Or, it might not be a screenshot from the anime itself, it could be just a promotional image of the character. For example, see the main image to illustrate another GA nomination, Leafa. ISD (talk) 08:03, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Which do you think is best User:ISD?Tintor2 (talk) 13:57, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - From that page, the image in the infobox looks the best personally speaking. ISD (talk) 18:56, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - Done ISD.Tintor2 (talk) 21:00, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      - Good. ISD (talk) 08:16, 11 April 2017 (UTC) Y[reply]
Not sure if the sentence: "As in D.Gray-man, the Earl promised people their dead love ones back to life", reads quite right. Might make more sense to read: "As in D.Gray-man, the Earl promised people to return their dead love ones back to life".
- Done.Tintor2 (talk) 22:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Good. ISD (talk) 08:03, 10 April 2017 (UTC) Y[reply]
The sentence: "Towards the series' beginning, Hoshino found the character as one of easiest to one alongside Hevlaska", doesn't make sense to me. Do you mean the character was one of the easiest to draw, to write for etc.? I assume it is to draw given the sentence afterwards.
- DoneTintor2 (talk) 22:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Good. ISD (talk) 08:03, 10 April 2017 (UTC) Y[reply]
Again, the sentence: "When it was revealed that the Earl and the other Noah were living in the Kamelot family as a normal human", doesn't quite make sense. Should it be "normal humans" plural, or am I missing something?
- Done.Tintor2 (talk) 22:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Good. ISD (talk) 08:03, 10 April 2017 (UTC) Y[reply]
The [ch. 218] reference doesn't appear to fit in with the WP:STYLE requirements. Punctuation should precede references.
- Reworded.
  - Good. ISD (talk) 08:03, 10 April 2017 (UTC) Y[reply]
The sentence: "He also noted that the character the contrast", also appears not to quite read right.
- Reworded.Tintor2 (talk) 22:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Good. ISD (talk) 08:03, 10 April 2017 (UTC) Y[reply]
In "Earl's tapioca milk tea was served at the 2016 D. Gray-man Halloween Cafe in Tokyo", D. Gray-man should be in italics.
- Done.Tintor2 (talk) 22:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Good. ISD (talk) 08:03, 10 April 2017 (UTC) Y[reply]

Hope this is of some use. ISD (talk) 21:30, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As everything has been carried out I think that this is now officially a good article. Well done Tintor2. ISD (talk) 08:16, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Millennium Earl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160801024542/http://www.funimation.com/blog/2016/07/29/d-gray-man-hallow-broadcast-dub-cast-announcement/ to http://www.funimation.com/blog/2016/07/29/d-gray-man-hallow-broadcast-dub-cast-announcement/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:50, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]