Talk:Millbourne, Pennsylvania/GA3

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Steelkamp (talk · contribs) 13:23, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Review coming soon. Steelkamp (talk) 13:23, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to quickfail this review. There are several problems:

This is a long way from meeting the good article criteria for being well written and broad in its coverage.
There are several instances of close paraphrasing, as shown by this tool.
The tag at the top of the article is definitely still valid.
The issues stated in the previous two reviews have not been fixed.

Here are some things you should do before renominating this article again.

The article could do with a major rewrite. This would help with GA criterion 1 and with the close paraphrasing issue.
Expansion is needed for the history section. Why is there hardly any history from 1909 to the present?
Unit conversions should be added for the temperatures.
There are some paragraphs which should have sources added.
What's a shared car "node"?
If the borough had a fire department until 2019, then who provides that service now?
There's no detail on state or federal politics. What state and federal electoral district is Millbourne in?
What is a borough? Is there a page that can be linked to that explains that?
Courts and schools are only mentioned in the lead. Education in particular could do with its own section.
There's honestly too many images.
Look at what the other reviewers before me have said. They make good points.

I suggest you don't nominate this article again until at least the above things are fixed. Steelkamp (talk) 10:54, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Steelkamp, from my understanding, the issues that still remain from the other reviewers include MOS issues, referencing issues, and broad coverage. Is this correct? PersonKnows (talk) 18:22, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Steelkamp (talk) 05:35, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]